Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Forgot your password? Forgot your username?
Threaded Indented

TOPIC: Reaction to Signings

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99977

jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
Ben wrote:
I agree with the sentiments of your post Andy, but I hope you don't begrudge the articles I have written on here.

They were done to help with my journalism. I also don't have any intention to divert the attention away from the far more important off field matters and I'm carefully aware that I don't want to be contributing to any propaganda.

If you read my articles, you will see that I have made every attempt to highlight the problems we have and show skepticism towards the new signings. I actually tried to create my own propaganda for the Trust.For instance,'The signings come after owner, Jim Rushe, revealed the budget would be the same for this year's team.' That was to hint my displeasure at how we can spend the same wages on players despite playing at Stafford in front of few fans. I also put things such as Evo-Stik Division One South and Stafford. Not to mention picking out a quote that showed Zach Hibbert turned down BSN clubs for Vics after a decent deal. I hope you can see that.
So why did you click the 'thankyou' button on Wayne reporting John's signing?

I'm going to have a guess at saying it was because he was saying thank you to Wayne for giving fans information.
Strange then considering he said hes not going next season

Why would that mean he can't say thank you?

I'm not going next season but I still appreciate Wayne giving fans information.
  • NVFC1992
  • NVFC1992
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 25
  • Thanks Received: 11
  • -
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Advertisment

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99978

NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
Ben wrote:
I agree with the sentiments of your post Andy, but I hope you don't begrudge the articles I have written on here.

They were done to help with my journalism. I also don't have any intention to divert the attention away from the far more important off field matters and I'm carefully aware that I don't want to be contributing to any propaganda.

If you read my articles, you will see that I have made every attempt to highlight the problems we have and show skepticism towards the new signings. I actually tried to create my own propaganda for the Trust.For instance,'The signings come after owner, Jim Rushe, revealed the budget would be the same for this year's team.' That was to hint my displeasure at how we can spend the same wages on players despite playing at Stafford in front of few fans. I also put things such as Evo-Stik Division One South and Stafford. Not to mention picking out a quote that showed Zach Hibbert turned down BSN clubs for Vics after a decent deal. I hope you can see that.
So why did you click the 'thankyou' button on Wayne reporting John's signing?

I'm going to have a guess at saying it was because he was saying thank you to Wayne for giving fans information.
Strange then considering he said hes not going next season

Why would that mean he can't say thank you?

I'm not going next season but I still appreciate Wayne giving fans information.
Who said he couldn't?
  • jamie
  • jamie
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 3967
  • Thanks Received: 100
  • -
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99983

jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
Ben wrote:
I agree with the sentiments of your post Andy, but I hope you don't begrudge the articles I have written on here.

They were done to help with my journalism. I also don't have any intention to divert the attention away from the far more important off field matters and I'm carefully aware that I don't want to be contributing to any propaganda.

If you read my articles, you will see that I have made every attempt to highlight the problems we have and show skepticism towards the new signings. I actually tried to create my own propaganda for the Trust.For instance,'The signings come after owner, Jim Rushe, revealed the budget would be the same for this year's team.' That was to hint my displeasure at how we can spend the same wages on players despite playing at Stafford in front of few fans. I also put things such as Evo-Stik Division One South and Stafford. Not to mention picking out a quote that showed Zach Hibbert turned down BSN clubs for Vics after a decent deal. I hope you can see that.
So why did you click the 'thankyou' button on Wayne reporting John's signing?

I'm going to have a guess at saying it was because he was saying thank you to Wayne for giving fans information.
Strange then considering he said hes not going next season

Why would that mean he can't say thank you?

I'm not going next season but I still appreciate Wayne giving fans information.
Who said he couldn't?
So then what was the point in asking him why he said thank you in the first place?
  • NVFC1992
  • NVFC1992
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 25
  • Thanks Received: 11
  • -
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99984

Because he likes to fill up negative threads about the club with pages full of quotes so that no-one can actually remember what the topic was about.
  • Mark Riding
  • Mark Riding
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 2379
  • Board Member
  • Thanks Received: 406
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Advertisment

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99987

markust wrote:
Because he likes to fill up negative threads about the club with pages full of quotes so that no-one can actually remember what the topic was about.
:lol: and you like and revel in adding to them
  • jamie
  • jamie
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 3967
  • Thanks Received: 100
  • -
Last Edit: 11 months 3 weeks ago by jamie.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jason

Re: Reaction to Signings 11 months 3 weeks ago #99988

NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
NVFC1992 wrote:
jamie wrote:
Ben wrote:
I agree with the sentiments of your post Andy, but I hope you don't begrudge the articles I have written on here.

They were done to help with my journalism. I also don't have any intention to divert the attention away from the far more important off field matters and I'm carefully aware that I don't want to be contributing to any propaganda.

If you read my articles, you will see that I have made every attempt to highlight the problems we have and show skepticism towards the new signings. I actually tried to create my own propaganda for the Trust.For instance,'The signings come after owner, Jim Rushe, revealed the budget would be the same for this year's team.' That was to hint my displeasure at how we can spend the same wages on players despite playing at Stafford in front of few fans. I also put things such as Evo-Stik Division One South and Stafford. Not to mention picking out a quote that showed Zach Hibbert turned down BSN clubs for Vics after a decent deal. I hope you can see that.
So why did you click the 'thankyou' button on Wayne reporting John's signing?

I'm going to have a guess at saying it was because he was saying thank you to Wayne for giving fans information.
Strange then considering he said hes not going next season

Why would that mean he can't say thank you?

I'm not going next season but I still appreciate Wayne giving fans information.
Who said he couldn't?
So then what was the point in asking him why he said thank you in the first place?
You know full well what it meant - why appear to be interested in signings but already stated not going next season
  • jamie
  • jamie
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 3967
  • Thanks Received: 100
  • -
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jason
Threaded Indented

Events Calendar

30 May 07 Jul
10 Jul 14 Jul