People will draw their own conclusions from that reply which doesn't do you or Jim Rushe any favours. It will be interpreted as weakness and probably get you more flack.
If you genuinely put forward your reasons I suspect you wouldn't get any abuse at all. What you would get is counter arguments and that can only be healthy, for you, for people who don't agree with you, this forum and the football club.

So be it.

I think you miss the point, this isn't about Jason. If you want to reduce the personal abuse which just provokes more in response then you need to get the actual arguments for and against out in the open.
My views are very clear but I am prepared to listen to 'the other side' and respond accordingly with my own. I'm just as likely to get slagged off as anyone else but I believe in my stance to the point where I can argue it.

In the meantime when I see people who I think won't look at what is happening, or give reasons to justify what is happening, then I think they are fair game to be shown up for what they are!

If Jason or anyone else comes on here and spells out their reasons then I respect that. I thought Jason was capable of doing that and have set myself up as well to help him. Fair enough he doesn't feel able to do it.

NotJim wrote:
My point is that people will sometimes do what they think is best for themselves and, consequently, will clearly not feel comfortable explaining their actions. It just seems that pushing for an explanation in these circumstances is futile.

This new thread continues the discussion from the 'Off Topic Posts' that went a bit 'off-topic'.

Thanks for your patience whilst I shifted things around.

Jason has a right to an opinion, but when he comes on here and says the things he does then is he only setting himself up for abuse. That's just how a forum works.

Any well educated person can formulate an argument with decent reasoning and facts to support any opinions they make, or otherwise they don't have any credibility.

Gents....

Time-out again, please.