Edge wrote:
Andy H wrote:
Sorry guys we have gone well off track in this, all I am asking is that we consider the impact of some of our statements - lets just base them on facts not speculation.
Andy, I think the reason for most of the disagreements on here is that there appear to be two sets of facts to every story.
Take the CVA as an example, The FA and the League agreed with the administrators version of events.
Jim and the club have a different set of facts.
In the case of Warrington it seems the FA said no on Friday and Warrington said no on Sunday.
Both these "facts" appear to have come from the club.
No, There are one set of FACTS and one story totally fabricated to make Jim look good.
People need to get a grip and believe FACTS from official sources!
With regard to Jim and the Warrington situation, Andy H may not like it and has avoided answering a question directly but JIM LIED (Shock!) because he said it was the FA that blocked him.