Northwich Victoria News wrote:
Edge wrote:
how can the other 213 comment if this plan isn't available anywhere else but here?
Have you seen the Who are you thread? Care to give us more info on your background, experience, mothers maiden name etc.?
I think you missed the point of the post. the other 213+ people will find out over the next 2-3 weeks as we role out the bulk of the information. What has been done over the last 3 days is to let everyone in the town know there is another voice for the supporters of Northwich Victoria to follow.
It was to counter your view in the Guardian last week that this is the voice of the supporters, it's not it is one of them.
I have just put figures on this thread that show how many people have posted on here and you point out a thread that's nothing to do with this thread or me.
I didn't come on here for a job interview or your Trusts permission to do anything I came on here to see what the opposition is to a proper fair and open minded supporters club backing the present club and in this thread I got my answer 26 out of 124.
I will do everything I can with all my experience to do what is in the skeleton document on this thread. All the main information is to come on other web sites and of course this one that's why it is taking so long to be seen on other sites.
I think you and your colleagues instead of putting childish threads on this forum should start looking at what direction you are going in because from what I have been told you are going off on a tangent to Trust you were when the original Trust was formed.
NVST have always followed and adhered to the nationally recognised definition of a supporters trust as defined by Supporters Direct, 'a democratic not-for-profit organisation, made up of supporters, committed to strengthening the voice of supporters in the decision making process at a club, and strengthening the links between the club and the community it serves.'
That is still the case. At no point does it say anything about supporting the club financially, nor does it say that we should unconditionally follow the owner, even when he has extremely questionable business practices and can be held largely responsible for the poor management of the club leading to a situation that seems to have very few outcomes other than the loss of nearly 140 years of proud footballing history in our town. By preparing a basic business plan for a Phoenix Club, we are preparing to preserve that history. We have at no point said that it will be implemented immediately, infact it was made very clear at the recent supporters meeting, and accepted and understood by all there, that it would not be ennactioned until NVFC no longer existed.
Not all fans will sympathise with the ST, which was abundantly clear to all of us, well well before either yourself or Jim appeared on the scene. There have been 'rifts' between fans for years.
However, as someone who knows and has regular contact with a huge quantity of people with different viewpoints throughout our fanbase, may I just relay to you the general opinion of NVFC fans.
They think your ideas are utter tripe.
I will leave it at that.
